The Dane Tops Debrief

That idea is that the tech can be very dangerous and harmful and do untold damage if even the slightest of MUs accompany its use. Fear of doing harm is being instilled in those who have remained in the Church and the idea that KSW ((Keeping Scientology Working)) consists of an unrelenting robotic attention to outnesses. The study tapes thoroughly describe the demise of any subject when is is made too dangerous to use.

The following may be found in 8-8008, 8-80 and the early PDCs ((Philadelphia Doctorate Courses)).

The AESTHETIC FEELING of Tone 40 "unreasonableness" is the clue to the beingness that has taken over the management and it is this beingness that management is now attempting to create in others. As there is such a great aestheticness to the feeling of total Tone 40 unreasonableness, it becomes almost impossible to see the effect of this beingness once one is viewing life through it. This is the mechanism through which heinous acts may be committed by good beings. Because the being is attached to the aesthetic he goes along with the rest of what went with that aesthetic and is actually blind to the actual consequences of his actions. The end can also justify the means when one has a great enough aesthetic attached. Thus such a thing can actually occur where persons in rousing agreement with the "aesthetic" of KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING at all COSTS then take part in purifying Scientology. They buy the idea that time is scarce, there is great danger, there isn't time for routine justice actions. They buy the idea that they can afford to make mistakes and fix them later. The group aesthetic of "purifying" becomes moblike and the momentum of the group carries it forward. Only when there is no one left to remove, when too many posts become unmanned or improperly manned, when stats crash, does the " aesthetic" lift enough to start to see that some really pretty heavy disaster has aken place.

When one has become the effect of such an aesthetic beingness, he is likely to believe he has "seen the light" and all others who do not share the beingness become the unenlightened. As far as duplication, the beingness acts as a set of blinders on a horse. One cannot actually duplicate anyone who doesn't share the beingness because the beingness is an additive to the comm formula. In Scientology the "purify the tech" BEINGNESS that is being instilled is having the effect of separating and individuating people from all those who don't have the same beingness, WHETHER THE OTHERS ARE DELIVERING STANDARD TECH OR NOT. This arbitrary beingness that is being mocked up and demanded is one of the biggest additives in Scientology, and it is lowering duplication.

The IDEA of using Scientology in conjunction with other techs being "mixed practices" is the other great additive, for if this was indeed true, Scientology has just ended right here and now. The current idea is that the Bridge IS Scientology and THAT is where we USE Scientology. We don't deliver it with a particular slant into the reality of an athlete or a doctor. This would be "mixing practices", a "great and threatening danger". Yet Scientology SHOULD be combined with EVERYTHING and if an expert in a field improves his field through Scientology and teaches that to non-Scientologist in the field, that is GOOD, not squirrel. It is no dangerous, there is no terrible thing that will happen to others. If such a person had a principle inadequately commed, then he would be HAPPY to be crammed, as it would improve his product. But the idea that the ACTIVITY ITSELF is squirrel demonstrates a total MU on the concept of mixing practices or altering Scientology. The ability to match realities, to duplicate, is of prime importance in Scientology. We are condemning those who do it. We have made it a crime to teach anyone anything to do with Scientology. The verbal tech HCOB ((Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin)) was never intended to be used in this way. If we are so terribly afraid that our smallest communication of a Scientology datum or idea will constitute the demise of some fellow, we would have no self ability to judge or evaluate both abilities which must be gradiently acquired if one intends to be free. We have become so fearful of the terrible consequences of "out tech" that the tech is going off the lines of communication and mutual interchange. The lie is that it ever would have been that terrible, provided the ORGS kept their standards in. The wrong handling behind that is that squirrelling is a major problem that needed handling, when it was actually a matter of administrative disagreements and power struggles in management.

To go deeper, MONEY is a very big issue here. The Church now wants to tax all persons who help others using all or part of Scientology for profit. If Scientology was being allowed the freedom it actually needs to ever be a force in the culture, this taxation would be impossible to regulate because EVERYBODY would end up making profits through the use of Scientology and through teaching it to others. Any professional would feel DESIRE to impart it to others in his profession and would disseminate it or give it to others. Eventually all such contacted persons would go to orgs, but first they would learn Scientology within their own activities.

But such a vision could never take place with a Church paranoid about being "ripped off", attempting to tax all such use. Someone in our Church is very very concerned about money. Someone has spread the idea that the Church's members are rampant with financial overts and outright criminality. And that someone is demanding funds. In trying to get money, that someone has handed down policies, orders and declares in a Tone 40 aesthetic package that has wreaked havoc on us.

Only medical doctors are seen as immune of this other-practices idea, as Ron has sanctioned them as useful on the bridge. When others ARCX with the idea that they have "mixed practices" by using Scientology, it is seen as proof of their overts so sec checks ((security checks on the E-meter)) are demanded. Cramming cycles for MU cleanups are not the rule; sec checks are in.

Apple School has recently been attacked by an actual raid by Church officials on its premises. Once again the issue turned out to be money. A portion of the Apple School income was demanded for the "right" to use LRH tech. When one of the school heads asked to see this in writing, it was called a noncompliance and a sec check was demanded of the school's officials.

Persons are blowing because the policy on ethics gradients is not applied. Persons are blowing because ethics are being applied when not called for. Then they ARCX. Then they are accused of missed withholds. Then they are told to come up with thousands of dollars to clean up their own overts and MW/Hs. Then they leave.

Because a wary Scientologist secretly taped the blatant off P/L ((Policy Letter)) actions of a member of the FP and sent that tape to many people and because on top of that a SO member from the LA area went personally to the CS Int ((Case Supervisor, International)) and spent HOURS talking to him about the rabble caused in LA by this particular member of the FP, the management has been forced to recall and take action with that person (Don Larson). However, such a reprimand will not correct the situations in this letter. Don Larson is not an SP any more than the others who share the beingness that has been taught to them as the way to make Scientology work. He is only being recalled because his actions were secretly taped so could not be denied (although before knowing about the tape a report was written that denied the very things on that tape).

Ten years ago, when the prices were lower, the field did not use credit and barter as a rule. When the prices were raised the field resorted to more and more credit and barter, not having training to fall back on as the orgs did. Using credit and barter some field practice (not all by a long shot) stayed in existence no matter what happened to the prices. Missions too, resorted to hidden financial means in order to make it possible to continue to service a broad public. As so many thousands of Scientologists were dead stopped on the bridge when the price raising practice came about, these persons were more than happy to take advantage of some other way to pay besides money up front. An example of hidden financial methods in missions is Carl Barney's phony loans for PCs setup. Across the world persons who desired to audit resorted to off-line practices in order to stay active. These practices were withholds from the orgs "justified" by the field as necessary to stay in business. The orgs and field got very stingy about anyone who might have enough money to pay as such were the minority of the public. So animosity and competition festered between the two. Org reges would fume at losing a prospect to a field auditor who gave a better deal and this brought on the enforcement of the 2 year rule. But the problem was actually too few prospects with enough money. Eventually, thousands of Scientologists became inactive due to price increases and are still so. The running record that reges grew sick of was "But to make that much money I'd already have to be OT. It's a vicious circle". A ten year examination of statistics show that although at some times GI ((Gross Income)) has temporarily gone up from price increases, the numbers of persons being delivered to, proportionate to staff has decreased.