Lately it seems that a few updates are in order. In that atmospheric environment the following play-book may be relevant.
The flip side, which of course there always is one:
In the balance of play there comes to be established opposition and coalition. Where one becomes established, another takes root. It is not until the knife edge comes to be known before no-change takes place. It is not the balance brought to bear which leaves the ultimate mark but the natural tendency of the nature or basis of spirit to be laid bare and uncovered for the eyes to see. Man’s turmoil evinces the expression of that which ever remains constant. When this becomes understood by that which is expressed, individuality becomes laid bare. The realignment which then ensues merely completes the cycle.
Yes, the cycle of expression defines Man’s foray out into the ‘unknown’ universe for his own personal pleasure, with ‘pleasure’ being defined as full-fillment.
It is not the appearance of what is called balance, that is brought into play but something far greater. The trick in using balance is to assist the perspective in perceiving something unlike it’s self and thereby reducing the dependency upon existing modalities.
Do you see the underlying subterfuge?
There can only be a contextual right or wrong and in the absence of such, what then? Perhaps the reader will take up the challenge instead of waiting to be handed one’s self on a silver platter.
In either case the above play-book is but a general proposed guideline for one’s consideration. It’s not exact as that is not the purpose here, as stated.