Guestbook

  I am looking to evaluate the transcripts of the below listed tapes. This is a philological study, as to accuracy both as the transcripts themselves and as compared to the book “Phoenix Lectures” which contains them. If anyone has them please email themcclaughrys@yahoo.com.

5407C19 7ACC-24 Duplication: Religious Aspects of Scientology; also titled - Scientology: Its General Background (Part II as PRO-2)

5407C19 7ACC-25 Scientology and Civilization; also titled - Scientology: Its General Background (Part I and Part III as PRO-1 and PRO-3) - [note: sounds like there are two lectures or at least two parts to this on that same day of July 19, 1954]

5407C20 7ACC-26 Bridge Between Scientology and Civilization  : submitted by Mike and Virgina McClaughry on 18 Mar 2008

  Hi Guys,

I am new to Gathering Minds. I myself would so appreciate the opportunity to talk to Geoffrey Filbert sometime. I truly believe this man is a genius when it comes to his ability to use the tech.

I have read parts of his Excalibur book online. This being has what it takes to take you up and out of the mess called Planet Earth.

I also have the tendency to want to fix myself up and look for the answers. But I get myself into trouble by doing this.

Does anyone know where Geoffrey maybe, and how to reach him. With all my heart I could use his help.

Best Wishes to all.

Dan

Hi Dan,

Here is the contact information for Geoffrey:
(Contact information sent privately)

Please give him my regards when you speak with him. He is a great guy.

All the best,

  Goeffrey Filbert is one of he few beings (and the only one whom I have personally known) able and willing to fully embrace and publish the Realization that what is Prime is not necessarily Unmoved.

Or rather that it has (in its dichotomized ranges) enturbulated Itself considerably with nearly infinite dispersals of reflexive attempts to Self-know — of which all ranges and frequencies of “when” and “where” as we know them are the emanated attempts at resolution.

The paradox of Paradise Lost yet not really.

The fitful slumber of Something/Nothing both sleeping and yet awake; fitful and yet unperturbed (depending on whether manifest or not or both).

This is hinted at in metaphsical lore, but seldom so boldly announced as is done in the case of Mr. Filbert.

And it is a thing exceedingly momentous to encounter in ANY range of Consciuosness.  : submitted by Thomas Hill on 03 Dec 2007

  Hello all

It amazes me that after reading just about everything I can find on the subject of Life, Theta, God, Religen, Magic, Minds, etc. (what ever you want to call the general subject of existance) that just when I thought i had a really good understanding of it all and how it applies to Beingness I get some new tidbit of knollage that adjusts and realigns it all.

At this point in time I feel Paul has had the most influential affect on all the information i have gained. I keep reading this websight over and over making sure i get the intention conveyed the affect on my knowingness is really very plesurable. its alot like finally getting some joke that you thought you understood. Paul you seem to be very fundamental in your philosophy minimizing all the long drawn out procedures and unnecessary chit chat -thank you!!

Am i correct when I say all the methods of enlightment are basicly dev t. only usefull for those who have agreed it is necessary or maybe need the mass for the game?

What im getting at is the whole mess can be sidesteped if a Being just bees or not.

Guess Shakspheer had it all figgured out.

TO BE OR NOT TO BE. (the VERY FIRST thought) from which all else stems. I see a large fractual starting with the above comment than becoming the infanent greenery befor us. why clome back through all the branches when you can just jump off? Hummmm Well Im still here so ill keep at it thanks Paul.

Mikey

Mikey, you’ve been around for quite some time and your insights continue to progessively develop. Excellent!

Just to clarify things: The very first thought is not whether to be or not as both of those items are simply the result of that specific thing which enables thought to come alive in the first place. You, the person named Mikey, are the result of your decision to be and the end result of ‘not to be’ is simply a movement to the other side of the equation.

It is a dichotomy and therefore should not be confused with what is real, or that which precedes it.

It answers the question of the purpose and plan of multiple lifetimes, each acting out an ‘individual’ life experience.

In this regard, the person named ‘Mikey’ is of absolutely no value whatsoever. But as to the who or what which encompasses those human characteristics - well, let’s just say that there is nothing more precious in the universe, nothing more grand, spectacular and awe-inspiring than it, itself. And the nice thing is that you don’t have to do a darned thing to be that - you already are.

In celebration of your achievement I am going to create a Symposiumn here at Gathering-Minds.net so that you can, if you so wish, continue writing about your insights. Look for it soon at http://gathering-minds.net/symposium

  Hmmmmm…….

Great stuff here….like the layout.

To get to it I have a question.

I am looking for an auditor, and I was wondering If you knew where or how I could Contact Geoffrey Filbert. Ive wanted to contact the guy for about 2 years now and just haven’t even tried. I Found his book Excaliber on the net a while back and have read it off and on since then. I read allot of other stuff as well. His book in my opinion is the best out there. I can’t seem to find anything even comparable, everything else I read eventually leads me back to this book Excaliber, and this guy Geoffrey,

If I’m in the chair this is the guy that I want on the other side, I could trust the guy I believe and there are lots of reasons for that I suppose.

Number 1, he didn’t start a group.
Number 2, He seems to know what he is doing.
Number 3, I don’t seem to always know what I’m doing.
Number 4, I believe he would actually let me find out just what it is I am doing, he has integrity.

I just like his overall view of the Tech which to him is simple, for me its not quite so simple, not yet anyhow, and I plan on taking his advice and not pursuing the education where he formerly received it. I’m not up to being a competent auditor or self auditor. But I would Like to be one. I’ve been pretty anti aberration since my first exteriorization in high school, not quite sure how I did it. There is allot of charge for me in that area, and I’m not fully sure how to run it out, and I’m not sure if I could do it alone. The event for the most part changed my whole view on life and led me to do allot of that useless seeking and I’ve ran into my fare share of dead ends. Yet here I am. Right. And with a little help (the right kind) and a little work (the fun kind) I’m more here every day.

Right now I need help, I know that, I need a dust off, and allot of thing’s I don’t even know I need, I’m a fairly occluded case. IT takes case gain to wake up, and really look around, and I myself, only seem to pull off the layers in incorrect sequences and then SNAP, I’m back where I was before. Its gotta come off right, that series of locks and secondaries and whatever else is there, and it seems Geoffrey has that one figured out. Getting auditing from the guy would be the highlight of my life. This stuff doesn’t come around often and I know in a sorts what I’m going for and that is OT. I’m young, and I think that is a possible goal for this life. I really think I could pull it off. So here I am Begging for his number(feeling slightly pathetic), hopping you have it and could share it. It’s hard finding people you can “trust” in this “arena”, at least that’s been my experience, and I’m afraid to go digging into my case alone, but know enough to go, “NO GROUPS!”.

I don’t know how I could possibly thank you, but for now, Thank You.

Dusty

Email me if you have questions.

Hi Dusty.

Thanks for your communication, it was great reading about your interest in greater awareness and your ideas on and about Geoffrey. It sounds like he would be a perfect fit for you. The contact information I have on him is several years old but most likely it is still good. Here is it:

Geoffrey Filbert …
(Contact information sent privately)

He also has a message machine in California as he travels down there from time to time: xxx.xxx.xxxx

If you get ahold of him, give him my regards.

All the best,

  Hello

There is alot of info out there about this area of the galaxy. Whats going on elsewere in this and the other galaxies.

it seems to me thiers a lot of interest in this planet full of so called misfits. whats up with what must be a couple of quadrabagilliongoogleplex to the 8th power other pieces imbodied or not doing?

It took me most of this lifetime just to realize what and who i am. i dont really care too much but the question has just been popping up lately. hummm.

might be the hubble pictures i saw the other day pretty interesting i guess, thier must of been a hundred no a thousand well maybe a—- well thier was alot of galaxies in view.

depending on your viewpoint it unbelievably vast. i think it goes as far as you look. anyway,

I had an interesting cognition a while back. its kind of difficult to explain. its like the viewpoint of my body is the entrance point to this vast overwhelming space of the entire physical universe.But instead of looking through i “stepped back a bit or pulled my anchor points back and saw this incredibly endless space known as the phsical universe shrink to a pretty small dark spot. the interesting thing to me was how bright the space was exterior to this small dark spec . i wonder? should i have just squished it so i wouldnt have to go so far back down? maybe next time!!! I wish i could get a better handle on it . I always get what i wish for sooner or later.

affinity all
mikey  : submitted by Mikey on 31 Jan 2007

  I’m starting to read fza-gathering minds. It’s interesting December 26 2006. thanks, rich. : submitted by Richard R Heinz on 26 Dec 2006