Contributed by FZA on Tuesday, January 02 @ 11:21 AM
from the A-Fascinating-Process dept. |
On 1 Jan 2001, Robert posted on ACT:
Ron talks about an interesting process in one of the lectures. The quote goes this way:
------------
"There are many ways you take apart randomity. But you take apart automaticity by knocking into pieces randomity. There's something wrong with randomity if the fellow has automaticity. So we don't pay much attention to automaticity because you're never going to get the preclear to look at what he's postulated that he can't look at. So you have to come in the side door and you start handling speed. And you handle speed directly by realizing that he chose something out [for randomity - R.D.].
"Now, let's say we have this fellow who has a fear of disease. Here's one way to solve the randomity in this case. We'd say, 'All right, now be yourself as a body. Now be the disease attacking the body. Now be the disease attacking some other body.' See that?
" 'Now be the disease; be your body; be the disease.......' Basic technique is: 'be the disease. Be your body. Be the disease. Be the body. Be the disease. Be the body. Be the disease getting all through the body. Now, be all through the body resisting the disease.' See?
"In other words, we find a war in progress and we take it out by making the thetan, first, be both sides of it, then have him be willing to fight such a war which is the next thing you've got to solve and next by just being an observer of both sides of it. And because he's holding on to both sides of it, it'll collapse."
------------
I haven't had the occasion yet to try this out, but it seems like it could handle a lot of case on a person because it hits directly at creation of the two oppsition terminals. It a scientology counterpart to the shift handling part of the R3XD process. One could get pretty innovative with this process, like including the various dynamics, flows, terminals, scenarios, etc.
I'd be interested in responses from anyone who tries or has tried out this process.
Robert
|
|
In order to comment on this message, you must first log in.
|
|
|
